Getting The Public Invested In Science

FundScience Blog


Welcome to the FundScience Blog. This page was created to bring you the news of our venture by the FundScience team (Category: FundScience News) as well as interesting subjects that are related to education and science. We welcome and encourage comments and discussions on the posted topics. If you are a writer and are interested in posting please contact us. If you are a reader we hope that you sign-up for a feed of our blog and/or a quarterly collection of the published articles in an easy to read and pass to friends PDF format.

We hope you stay with us as we develop this exciting project!

The FundScience Team

FundScience Collaborates with Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center

08.11.09 by FundScience

FundScience and the Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center(PSC) have agreed to work together on the common goal of broadening research resources available to scientists and the public. PSC provides university, government, and industrial researchers with access to high-performance computing (HPC), communications and data-handling technologies. As a result of the partnership with PSC, applicants eligible for the grants funded and facilitated by FundScience will have an option to qualify for access to PSC’s HPC resources. PSC will also provide computing resources for FundScience .

The FundScience grant application, which will be soon posted on the FundScience website, will include information required to receive a PSC starter grant.  The donation is subject to the applicant qualifying for a FundScience grant and subject to final approval by PSC.  FundScience is working on establishing similar partnerships with organizations across the country in order to service a broader population.

About PSC:

The Pittsburgh Supercomputing Center is a joint effort of Carnegie Mellon University and the University of Pittsburgh together with Westinghouse Electric Company. Established in 1986, PSC is supported by several federal agencies, the Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and private industry, and is a partner in the National Science Foundation TeraGrid program.

Tags: , , , ,
| Posted in FundScience News | Comments Off

What would science look like if it were invented today?

07.13.09 by Daniel Mietchen

Editor’s Note: The following is an article by guest blogger Daniel Mietchen, PhD, originially written up for the Euroscientist, the blog of Euroscience.org. This first part of a two-part series on “What would science look like if it were invented today?” deals specifically with the implications of  the transition from paper-based to electronic communication for the process of knowledge creation. It delves into the importance of collaboration and openness in science. FundScience.org cross-posts this article, as well as the forthcoming second installment, because of our passion to promote open science and collaboration, not only between scientists, but between the scientific community and the public. Note that the drafting takes place in a wiki, so you can join in.

The Internet represents an opportunity to change this system, one which has created a 300-year-old, collective long-term memory, into something new and more efficient, perhaps adding in a current, collective short-term working memory at the same time. With new online tools, scientists could begin to share techniques, data and ideas online to the benefit of all parties, and the public at large. (Robert J. Simpson, paraphrasing Michael Nielsen)

Sure, it is hard to imagine you reading this blog post in a world which hadn’t yet engaged in science but the question “What would email look like if it were invented today” was recently addressed during the presentation of the Wave protocol, and entertaining some similar ideas on reinventing science may perhaps be worthwhile: how would a system have to be designed that creates and structures knowledge such that these two complex processes can effectively feed on and adapt to each other, making use of the most appropriate technologies at hand? Both processes are highly interrelated but to facilitate the discussion, we will first consider them separately (in this and the next issue of the Euroscientist), and then provide a synthesis (to which you can contribute).

Copyright 2010 FundScience LLC